LandWatch and Friends of the Metolius (FOM) filed their opening brief to the Oregon Court of Appeals on March 24, arguing that the approval of destination resort zones around the Metolius is improper.

When Governor Kulongoski submitted a letter to Diane Rosenbaum, Chair of the House Rules Committee, on June 22nd of last year, in what amounted to a veto of Senate Bill 30, he did so because he remained unconvinced that the state's land use system wasn't up to the task of protecting the Metolius Basin from the impacts of destination resorts. His appeal was to let the process play itself out.

When the Oregonian published an editorial on June 10th titled, "Yes, This River Must Be saved," that paper's editorial board asked whether Oregon could protect the precious Metolius River without subverting its land-use system and water laws.

Earlier this week, after receiving a State Land Use Board of Appeals decision (attached below), and a letter from the Governor's office, LandWatch's longstanding assertion that the state lacks clear authority to protect the Metolius and its basin and that new solutions are needed was confirmed.

HeadWaters Economics, who also just released this study on the potential economic impacts of a Badlands Wilderness east of Bend, has also released a new study on the potential for future development on fire-prone lands and the implications on future fire-fighting costs. The report, which addresses fire risk throughout the west, also as a section on Oregon.